[ 吳丹紅 ]——(2007-4-19) / 已閱52107次
A Review on the Science of Evidence Law in China
——distinguishing the science of evidence Law from the science of evidence
WU Dan－h(huán)ong
(Peking University, Beijing, 100871)
Abstract：Through a review on the historical division of the science of evidence and the science of evidence law, we can realize the efforts being made by scholars. It is a tendency for the science of evidence law to be independent of the science of evidence and the science of procedural law. Looking back the whole development history of the science of evidence law in China, from 1930 to 2005, it is the period of germination, evolution, frustration and re-foundation, in which there are a lot of inextricable issues and arguments, especially when it tangled with the science of evidence again. In order to keep up the development of the research of the science of evidence law, we should take full advantage of academic resources with respect to the science of evidence law in common law system, shrink research subject and improve the methods, and subsequently move forward and deeper in the science of evidence law.
Key Words:Law of Evidence; Science of Evidence; Research Object; Independent Subject
收稿日期：2005年11月1日，發(fā)表于政法論壇(中國政法大學(xué)學(xué)報) 2006年第2期
總共3頁 [1] [2] 3
上一頁
